ZARINA ATAN V KERJURUTERAAN WARISAN TEKENIK SDN. BHD
[2009] 1 MLJ IX
The Company approved the Claimants leave for only 5 days but she took 15 days to celebrate her marriage.
The Industrial Court held: "It is incumbent upon an employee before going on leave, to ensure that the Company had granted the application for leave because it is at the absolute discretion of the Company.The employee cannot be absent from work and then apply for leave."
Posted
This site contains legal material relating to Employer/Employee Relations.All HR Executives are advised to be familiar with the Employment Act and the Industrial Relations Act 1967. A word of advice for all HR Executives- treat the wounds as soon as they appear-Some diseases need immediate attention due to their infectious nature. The end result may lead to a substantial Court Order or an out of Court Settlement which burns the Companys pockets. Vijay-LLB,CLP,LLM.
Monday, June 21, 2010
PAN GLOBAL TEXTILES BHD, PULAU PINANG V ANG BENG TEIK
[2002]2 MLJ 27
"
"
The Federal Court stated that no employee could claim leave of absence as
a matter of right without any permission granted for the same."
HARAPAN RAMAI SDN. BHD V, JOHOR V YAJADESAN RAMAN
[1997] 3 ILR 410
"An employees right to annual leave cannot be claimed as of right and he must obtain the permission the employer relieving him from attending work."
"An employees right to annual leave cannot be claimed as of right and he must obtain the permission the employer relieving him from attending work."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)